Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers are expected to evaluate submitted manuscripts thoroughly, fairly, and objectively. The following aspects should be considered when reviewing articles submitted to Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial:

1. Presentation

Does the paper present a cohesive and logical argument?
Are the ideas and flow of thought clearly presented?

2. Writing Quality

Is the title accurate and reflective of the content?
Is the manuscript concise, well-structured, and easy to follow?

3. Length and Structure

Does the manuscript need to be expanded or shortened?
Should any sections be summarized, merged, or removed?

4. Title

Is the title succinct and clear, avoiding unnecessary abbreviations?
Does it reflect the main findings or conclusions of the paper?

5. Abstract

Does the abstract clearly summarize the following elements?

Background
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

6. Introduction

Clear explanation of the research background
State of the art and relevant studies to support the novelty
Gap analysis or research justification
Research hypothesis or problem statement (optional)
Research approach to solving the problem
Clear statement of research objectives

7. Method

Clear and replicable research methods
Descriptions beyond definitions — detail on how the research was conducted
Explanation of research site, participants, instruments, and data analysis

8. Results and Discussion

Processed data presented in tables or figures, supported with explanation
Findings linked to research objectives or questions
Comparison with previous studies (agreement or contradiction)
Scientific interpretation of findings
Implications of the research clearly explained
Stated limitations or weaknesses of the study
Suggestions for further research or exploration of ideas

9. Conclusion

Answers the research objectives clearly
Includes implications or recommendations (optional)
Written in paragraph form (not bullet points or numbering)